You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 12, December 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Interobserver Variability in the Interpretation of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Head and Neck Masses

B. Robert Peters, MD; Vicki J. Schnadig, MD; Francis B. Quinn, Jr, MD; James A. Hokanson, PhD; Paul Zaharopoulos, MD; M. Melinda McCracken, MS; Charles M. Stiernberg, MD; Lee Des Jardins, CT (ASCP)

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(12):1438-1442.


Abstract

• Fine-needle aspiration biopsy is gaining acceptance as a clinically useful tool. We set out to evaluate the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy at our institution by measuring the interobserver variability in cytopathologic interpretation, and by measuring the agreement between cytopathologic and histologic diagnosis. In a prospective study, 253 aspirations were performed on head and neck masses by the otolaryngology service. Specimens were interpreted independently by two cytopathologists (V.J.S. and P.Z.), and interpretations were compared with the surgical histopathologic diagnosis when available. The interobserver variability between cytopathologists was 8% with a specificity of 96% and a sensitivity of 97%. We conclude that fine-needle aspiration biopsy is a safe and useful tool in the diagnosis of head and neck masses. In the diagnosis of epithelial cysts and squamous epithelial malignancies, fine-needle aspiration biopsy is as accurate as open biopsy.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115:1438-1442)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology (Drs Peters, Quinn, Hokanson, and Stiernberg and Ms McCracken) and Pathology (Drs Schnadig, Quinn, and Zaharopoulos and Ms Des Jardins), University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 25, 1989.

Reprint requests to University of Texas Medical Branch, Department of Otolaryngology, E-21, Galveston, TX 77550 (Dr Quinn).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prospective Study on Neck Dissection after Primary Chemoradiation Therapy in Stage IV Pharyngeal Cancer
BREMKE et al.
Anticancer Res 2009;29:2645-2653.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interobserver Variability in the Interpretation of Brush Cytologic Studies From Head and Neck Lesions
Nichols et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:1350-1355.
ABSTRACT  

Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Neck Nodes
de Jong et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:402-404.
ABSTRACT  

Submandibular Gland Tumors: Adverse Histologic Factors and Therapeutic Implications
Weber et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:1055-1060.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.