You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 12, December 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparative Evaluation of Cefuroxime Axetil and Cefaclor for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Maxillary Sinusitis

Austin Sydnor, Jr, MD; Jack M. Gwaltney, Jr, MD; David M. Cocchetto, PhD; W. Michael Scheld, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(12):1430-1433.


Abstract

• Cefuroxime axetil, a new β–lactamase-stable cephalosporin, was compared with cefaclor for the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis in 106 adult patients. Direct sinus aspirations for quantitative bacterial culture were done for all patients before treatment; aspiration was repeated for most patients after treatment. Pretreatment sinus aspirates were positive for 63 of 134 sampled sinuses. Of specimens yielding at least 104 CFU/mL, Haemophilus Influenzae (38%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (37%) were the most common pathogens. Ten (42%) of 24 strains of Hinfluenzae, 2 (40%) of 5 Haemophilus parainfluenzae, and all 3 isolates (60%) of Branhamella catarrhalis produced β-lactamase. Cefuroxime axetil, 250 mg twice a day, was compared with cefaclor, 500 mg three times a day. Among culture-positive sinuses, bacteriologic cure was achieved in 36 (95%) of 38 sinuses and 15 (71%) of 21 sinuses treated with cefuroxime axetil and cefaclor, respectively. The overall frequencies of adverse events were similar between drugs, although cefuroxime axetil was associated with more frequent diarrhea. Cefuroxime axetil was an effective therapy for the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis in adults.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115:1430-1433)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology, Martha Jefferson Hospital, Charlottesville, Va (Dr Sydnor); the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville (Drs Gwaltney and Scheld); Glaxo Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC (Dr Cocchetto); and the Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville (Dr Scheld).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 21, 1989.

Presented in part at the 28th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Los Angeles, Calif, October 1988.

Reprint requests to 1000 E High St, Suite A, Charlottesville, VA 22901 (Dr Sydnor).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Randomized Controlled Trial of 3 vs 10 Days of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole for Acute Maxillary Sinusitis
Williams et al.
JAMA 1995;273:1015-1021.
ABSTRACT  

Cefuroxime Axetil in the Treatment of Sinusitis: A Review
Paker et al.
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:165-175.
ABSTRACT  

Cefaclor vs Amoxicillin in the Treatment of Acute, Recurrent, and Chronic Sinusitis
Huck et al.
Arch Fam Med 1993;2:497-503.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.