You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 7, July 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Orbital Wall and Volume Relationships

Gregory S. Parsons, MD; Robert H. Mathog, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;114(7):743-747.


Abstract

• Assuming that intraorbital volume is a space defined by the orbital walls, and that intraorbital contents represent a space occupied by soft tissues, changes between volume and contents will result in movement of the globe in usually a forward (exophthalmic) or backward (enophthalmic) direction. An understanding of the phenomenon is important if the clinician is to judge the effects of traumatic displacement of an orbital wall on globe positions and if the clinician is to design a reconstructive procedure to correct these changes. To study such relationships, we have designed physical models based on measurements of five dry human skulls. With these models, it has been possible to move a whole wall or part of a wall and, thereby, adjust the orbital volume. The experimental manipulations are useful in predicting the relationships of the orbital wall position and volume—information that can be ultimately used for diagnosis and reconstructive purposes.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:743-747)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University, Detroit.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 26, 1988.

Read at the fall meeting of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chicago, Sept 18, 1987.

Reprint requests to Department of Otolaryngology, 5E-UHC, 540 E Canfield, Detroit, MI 48201 (Dr Mathog).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Use of Image-Guided Systems in the Reconstruction of the Periorbital Region
Haegen et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:266-271.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgery of Traumatic Defects of the Orbital Floor
Mathog
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:1402-1403.
FULL TEXT  

Selective Approach to Surgery for Delayed Enophthalmos
KERSTEN and KULWIN
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:634-634.
ABSTRACT  

Selective Approach to Surgery for Delayed Enophthalmos-Reply
MATHOG and PARSONS
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:634-634.
ABSTRACT  

Surgical Correction of Enophthalmos and Diplopia: A Report of 38 Cases
Mathog et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:169-178.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.