You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 3, March 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Revision Rhinoplasty

Analysis and Treatment

Frank M. Kamer, MD; Sherry Ann McQuown, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;114(3):257-266.


Abstract

• As rhinoplasty becomes an increasingly popular procedure, the aesthetic expectations of both the facial plastic surgeon and the patient become more discriminating. Thus, the number of revision rhinoplasties increases. Of 697 rhinoplasties performed by the senior author (F.M.K.) during a three-year period, 18% of those procedures were revision surgeries. The senior author was the primary surgeon in 53% of those revision cases. This article presents an analysis of 126 consecutive revision rhinoplasty cases from that period, outlining the major deformities in a clinically meaningful system. Treatment of each problem category is discussed and representative cases are shown. The senior author's own revision rate and observations are discussed and compared with those in the medical literature.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:257-266)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Head and Neck Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine (Dr Kamer), and Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland (Dr McQuown).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 28, 1987.

Read before the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Denver, May 2, 1987.

Reprint requests to 201 S Lasky Dr, Beverly Hills, CA 90212 (Dr Kamer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Revision Rhinoplasty of Asian Noses: Analysis and Treatment
Park et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:146-155.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Seagull wing graft: a technique for the replacement of lower lateral cartilages.
Pedroza et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006;8:396-403.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rhinoplasty Approaches: Current State of the Art
Adamson and Galli
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:32-37.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nasal Tip Bossae in Rhinoplasty: Etiology, Predisposing Factors, and Management Techniques
Gillman et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999;1:83-89.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Revision Rhinoplasty: An Analysis of Aesthetic Deformities
Parkes et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;118:695-701.
ABSTRACT  

Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Bailey
JAMA 1989;261:2870-2872.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.