You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 10, October 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Relief of Sleep Apnea by Revision of the Adult Upper Airway

A Review of Clinical Experience

Quentin R. Regestein, MD; Richard Ferber, MD; T. Scott Johnson, MD; Benjamin J. Murawski, PhD; Marshall Strome, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;114(10):1109-1113.


Abstract

• Surgical revision of the upper airway for obstructive sleep apnea has repeatedly improved subjective more than objective laboratory outcome measures. To examine this disparity, we obtained subjective sleepiness questionnaire scores, Continuous Performance test, and polysomnography (PSG) in 40 patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (mean apnea index, 33.9; mean minimum oxygen saturation during sleep, 75.4%). Continuous Performance test confirmed abnormal daytime sleepiness and correlated with minimum oxygen saturation and number of transitions between stages. Postoperatively, questionnaire scores fell a mean of 62%, indicating a marked improvement in subjective sleepiness. Changes in questionnaire score correlated with changes in minimum oxygen saturation. Mean PSG indexes showed no change. Individual patients without PSG improvement reported long-term improvement in daytime functioning, as confirmed by family members. These results suggest that measures in addition to PSG, including patient subjective response, would more fully characterize the outcome of revision of the upper airway for sleep apnea.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:1109-1113)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Medicine (Drs Regestein, Johnson, and Murawski) and Surgery (Dr Strome), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Pediatrics (Dr Ferber), Children's Hospital, and the Harvard Medical School, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 18, 1988.

Reprint requests to Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (Dr Regestein).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.