You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 9, September 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Clinical Evaluation of Gold-Plated Tubes for Middle-Ear Ventilation

LCDR Thomas A. Tami, MC; LCDR Kevin S. Kennedy, MC; CDR Earl Harley, MC

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(9):979-980.


Abstract

• Gold-plated tympanostomy tubes have been recently marketed as possessing qualities making them ideal for middle-ear ventilation. The performance of these tubes was compared with that of similarly designed Teflon tubes in a controlled, prospective study. Twenty-eight children underwent bilateral myringotomy and tube placement. One ear was randomly chosen for intubation with a gold-plated tube, and a Teflon tube was inserted into the other ear. Patients were examined monthly for 12 months and evaluated for otorrhea, tube occlusion, and early tube extrusion. Although the incidence of otorrhea and tube occlusion were higher for the gold-plated tube, these differences were not statistically significant. The gold-plated tube had a significantly higher rate of early extrusion than the Teflon tube. Based on these findings, there appears to be no advantage to using gold-plated tubes for middle-ear ventilation.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:979-980)



Author Affiliations

USN; USNR; USN

From the Departments of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Naval Hospitals, Portsmouth, Va (Dr Tami), Oakland, Calif (Dr Kennedy), and San Diego (Dr Harley).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 20, 1987.

Read before the annual meeting of the Pacific Coast Oto-Ophthalmological Society, Seattle, June 30, 1987.

The views and assertions contained herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Navy or the Department of Defense.

Reprint requests to the Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Naval Hospital, Portsmouth, VA 23708 (Dr Tami).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.