You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 3, March 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Wound Healing and the Shaw Scalpel

Donna J. Millay, MD; Ted A. Cook, MD; Robert E. Brummett, PhD; Edward L. Nelson; Patricia L. O'Neill, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(3):282-285.


Abstract

• The Shaw heated scalpel is now widely used in head and neck surgery because it provides better hemostasis intraoperatively. Concerns persist over the immediate and long-term effects of this instrument on wound healing. This study compares heated and unheated Shaw scalpel incisions in the skin of 7-week-old piglets. Tensile strength measurements and histologic evaluations were made at frequent intervals up to nine weeks after incision. Histologic studies showed no differences in the two groups at any time in the study. Tensile strength of wounds was significantly less two weeks after incision in the Shaw scalpel group, but following that time, the wounds increased in strength, and by seven weeks, the two groups were equal in this respect. Thus, we conclude that the Shaw scalpel wounds in pigs are, ultimately, similar to standard scalpel wounds, although there is a period of diminished tensile strength.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:282-285)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University (Drs Millay, Cook, and Brummett and Mr Nelson), and the Department of Biology, Portland State University (Dr O'Neill), Portland, Ore.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 27, 1986.

Read before the Spring Meeting of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Palm Beach, Fla, May 10, 1986.

Reprint requests to Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97201 (Dr Cook).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Shaw Scalpel and Development of Facial Nerve Paresis After Superficial Parotidectomy
Ramadan et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:296-298.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Role of the Argon Beam Coagulator in Facial Rejuvenation Surgery
Reino and Lawson
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:627-633.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.