You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 2, February 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Characterization of Olfactory Dysfunction

H. N. Wright, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(2):163-168.


Abstract

• Management of dysosmic patients frequently is hampered by an incomplete description of their chief complaint and sometimes inadequate qualitative analysis of their symptoms. Qualitative analysis of olfactory dysfunction by an Odorant Confusion Matrix helps to characterize more fully sense of smell in the dysosmic patient. It is well grounded in psychophysical theory, thereby permitting physiological inferences about specific neural dysfunctions. The quantitative measure derived from the matrix correlates well with another quantitative measure of olfactory ability, the Smell Identification Test, and provides the opportunity for valid comparisons among and within patients. Examination of illustrative case reports demonstrates that the qualitative features of the Odorant Confusion Matrix offer additional insights to support etiologic diagnoses of disturbances in sense of smell.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:163-168)



Author Affiliations

From the Clinical Olfactory Research Center and Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York—Health Science Center, Syracuse.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 26, 1986.

Reprint requests to Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, State University of New York-Health Science Center, 766 Irving Ave, 156 Weiskotten Hall, Syracuse, NY 13210 (Dr Wright).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Retronasal but Not Oral-Cavity-Only Identification of "Purely Olfactory" Odorants
Chen and Halpern
Chem Senses 2008;33:107-118.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chemosensory Cross-Modal Stroop Effects: Congruent Odors Facilitate Taste Identification
White and Prescott
Chem Senses 2007;32:337-341.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identification of Air Phase Retronasal and Orthonasal Odorant Pairs
Sun and Halpern
Chem Senses 2005;30:693-706.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Follow-up of Surgically Treated Phantosmia
Leopold et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:642-647.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What a Tangled Web We Weave: Discriminating between Malingering and Anosmia
Kurtz et al.
Chem Senses 1999;24:697-700.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship Between Uninasal Anatomy and Uninasal Olfactory Ability
Hornung and Leopold
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:53-58.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Successful Treatment of Phantosmia With Preservation of Olfaction
Leopold et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:1402-1406.
ABSTRACT  

Design Issues in Chemosensory Trials
Foulkes
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:65-68.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.