You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 11, November 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Postglossectomy Deglutitory and Articulatory Rehabilitation With Palatal Augmentation Prostheses

K. Thomas Robbins, MD; Julia B. Bowman, MA; Rhonda F. Jacob, DDS, MS

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(11):1214-1218.


Abstract

• For patients who may have significantly impaired deglutitory and articulatory functions after glossectomy, an important aspect of the rehabilitative management in our institution is the use of palatal augmentation prostheses. The aim is to reduce the free space between the roof and floor of the oral cavity to permit stronger lingual propulsion during oral deglutition and better linguopalatal contact during articulation. We evaluated ten patients who received this device after glossectomy during the past two years. Modified barium swallows and voice recordings were performed when possible with and without the use of the palatal augmentation prosthesis. Articulatory and deglutitory functions were evaluated on a scaled score ranging from 0 to 10 points. The scores of the patients' average immediate improvements were 4.5 points (range, 2 to 7) for articulation and 3.5 points (range, 2 to 7) for deglutition; the scores of average long-term improvements were 3.4 points (range, 2 to 7) and 2.2 points (range, 6 to 8), respectively. Patients using the palatal augmentation prosthesis experienced significant improvement in both functions. We believe that this device contributes greatly to rehabilitative therapy for patients who have undergone extirpative surgery for tumors of the oral cavity.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:1214-1218)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Head and Neck Surgery (Dr Robbins and Ms Bowman) and Dental Oncology (Dr Jacob), The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute at Houston. Dr Robbins is now with the Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego Medical Center.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 15, 1987.

Read before the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, Denver, April 29, 1987.

Reprint requests to Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego Medical Center, 225 Dickinson St, San Diego, CA 921103 (Dr Robbins).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Functional Results After Total or Near Total Glossectomy With Laryngeal Preservation
Weber et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:512-515.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.