 |
 |

Electrically Evoked Middle-Latency Auditory Potentials in Cochlear Implant Candidates
Paul R. Kileny, PhD;
John L. Kemink, MD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(10):1072-1077.
Abstract
Electric middle-latency auditory evoked responses (EMLRs) to transtympanic promontory stimulation were obtained from 19 of 22 ears of profoundly hearing-impaired patients evaluated for cochlear implant candidacy. The EMLRs were characterized by positive polarity peaks with latencies ranging from 20 to 30 ms, with the majority of responses exhibiting peaks in the range of 26 to 30 ms. Generally, the configuration of the EMLRs closely resembled the configuration of acoustic MLRs. While in most cases, behavioral thresholds to identical promontory stimulation were slightly lower, EMLR thresholds closely approximated behavioral electrical promontory thresholds. The EMLR thresholds correlated positively with implanted thresholds and exhibited a negative correlation with implanted dynamic current ranges.
(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:1072-1077)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication July 2, 1987.
Presented at the Tenth Annual Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Clearwater Beach, Fla, Feb 3, 1987.
Reprint requests to Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Hospitals, TC-1904, Box 0312, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0312 (Dr Kileny).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Electrically Evoked Auditory Brain-Stem Response in Pediatric Patients With Cochlear Implants
Kileny et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:1083-1090.
ABSTRACT
Electric Auditory Brain-Stem Responses in Nucleus Multichannel Cochlear Implant Users
Hodges et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:1093-1099.
ABSTRACT
Promontory Electrical Stimulation in Labyrinthectomized Ears
Lambert et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:197-201.
ABSTRACT
Middle-Latency Responses: II. Variation Among Stimulation Sites
Burton et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:458-461.
ABSTRACT
Middle-Latency Responses: I. Electrical and Acoustic Excitation
Burton et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:59-62.
ABSTRACT
|