You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 10, October 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Light Microscopic Evidence of Hair Cell Regeneration After Gentamicin Toxicity in Chick Cochlea

Raul M. Cruz, MD; Paul R. Lambert, MD; Edwin W. Rubel, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(10):1058-1062.


Abstract

• This study examines the temporal pattern of hair cell loss in the chick basilar papilla following ten days of gentamicin administration in hatchling chicks. Chicks were subsequently killed at ages 11, 18, 25, and 32 days. The basilar papillae were embedded in plastic and serially sectioned for light microscopic analysis. Hair cell counts were obtained at 100-µm intervals throughout the length of the papilla. Significant hair cell loss was documented basally in the 11-day-old chicks, and spread apically over time to maximal loss in the 18-day-old animals. Relative to the control chicks, there was a 36% hair cell loss in these animals. Interestingly, there appears to be a progressive partial recovery of the normal hair cell counts in the 25- and 32-day-old animals.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:1058-1062)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville (Drs Cruz and Lambert), and the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle (Dr Rubel).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 28, 1987.

Read before the Research Forum of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Atlanta, Oct 18, 1985.

Reprint requests to Box 430, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (Dr Lambert).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Recovery of Gaze Stability During Vestibular Regeneration
Haque et al.
J. Neurophysiol. 2008;99:853-865.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The developmental genetics of auditory hair cells
Hawkins and Lovett
Hum Mol Genet 2004;13:R289-R296.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gene expression differences in quiescent versus regenerating hair cells of avian sensory epithelia: implications for human hearing and balance disorders
Hawkins et al.
Hum Mol Genet 2003;12:1261-1272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Vocal Memory and Learning in Adult Bengalese Finches with Regenerated Hair Cells
Woolley and Rubel
J. Neurosci. 2002;22:7774-7787.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Insensitivity of the Chicken Embryo to the Ototoxicity of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics and a Loop Diuretic
Fikes et al.
Toxicol Pathol 1994;22:10-14.
ABSTRACT  

Distribution of Gentamicin to the Cochlea of the Chicken Embryo
Fikes et al.
Toxicol Pathol 1994;22:15-22.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.