 |
 |

Coronal Approach for Rejuvenation of the Eyes and Forehead
George A. Toledo, MD;
John L. Tate, MD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;112(7):738-744.
Abstract
Aesthetic surgeons are using the coronal forehead lift to achieve more consistent and enduring results due to a better understanding of the anatomy, dynamics, and aging process of the forehead. The varied indications for the procedure, such as soft-tissue ptosis and facial wrinkles, are discussed. The surgical technique is described, including the many controversial methods of managing the frontalis muscle. Eyeglasses and precise photography are employed to more objectively evaluate the amount of eyebrow elevation. Very gratifying results have been achieved with only minimal complications. The coronal forehead lift enhances the effects of the standard blepharoplasty and the orbicularis oculi muscle flap suspension techniques, and can be done in conjunction with a facial-cervical rhytidectomy. Presently, this is the procedure of choice in most women for rejuvenating the upper third of the face.
(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:738-744)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Louisiana State University Medical Center, Shreveport.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Sept 6, 1985.
Read in part before the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, New Orleans, Jan 12, 1985.
Reprint requests to Dallas Medical and Surgical Clinic, 4105 Live Oak St, Dallas, TX 75204 (Dr Toledo).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
The Case for Open Forehead Rejuvenation: A Review of 1004 Procedures
Cilento and Johnson
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009;11:13-17.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Effect of Facial Animation on the Aging Upper Half of the Face
Ellis and Masri
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:710-713.
ABSTRACT
Orbital Surgery: The Technique of Coronal Scalp Flap Approach to the Lateral Orbitotomy
Stewart et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1724-1726.
ABSTRACT
|