You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 112 No. 3, March 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Facial Bone Augmentation Using Bioglass in Dogs

Gerald E. Merwin, MD; Lawrence W. Rodgers; June Wilson, PhD; Richard G. Martin, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;112(3):280-284.


Abstract

• In the quest for a material other than autograft and homograft bone for use in facial augmentation and replacement, materials scientists have developed numerous inert materials, some of which have a porous structure allowing scar tissue ingrowth to aid in stabilization of the implant. This study investigates a bioactive, nonporous, transparent glass (Bioglass) in a dog model for use in facial bone augmentation. In 18 dogs studied in three groups at 1, 3, and 6 months, Bioglass implants developed a bond to bone or soft tissue in 54 of 72 instances (75% of the time). Poor bonding of mobile chin implants and the loss of three implants due to infection accounted for all but three of the 18 failures. Histologic evaluation revealed no untoward tissue response. Because of the tissue bonding ability and amenability to contouring with a diamond bur at the time of surgery, Bioglass is promising as a graft material for facial bone augmentation.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:280-284)



Author Affiliations

From the College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 6, 1985.

Read before the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Miami Beach, Fla, June 1, 1985.

Reprint requests to Box J-264, J. Hillis Miller Health Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610 (Dr Merwin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparison of Biomaterials for Facial Bone Augmentation
Maas et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:551-556.
ABSTRACT  

Calcium Phosphate Materials in Restorative Dentistry: a Review
Legeros
ADR 1988;2:164-180.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.