 |
 |

Cefazolin vs Moxalactam?A Double-blind Randomized Trial of Cephalosporins in Head and Neck Surgery
Jonas T. Johnson, MD;
Victor L. Yu, MD;
Eugene N. Myers, MD;
Robin L. Wagner;
Barbara A. Sigler, RN, MNEd
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;112(2):151-153.
Abstract
Cefazolin and moxalactam were compared in a prospective randomized double-blind trial of 118 patients undergoing oncologic head and neck surgery. Both antibiotics were given 2 g every four hours for four doses. Five infections were encountered in the cefazolin group (8.5%) and two infections in the moxalactam group (3.4%); this difference was not statistically significant. This assessment does not indicate, however, that the two regimens are equally efficacious.
(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:151-153)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Otolaryngology, Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication July 12, 1985.
Reprint requests to Eye and Ear Hospital, 230 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (Dr Johnson).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Ampicillin-Sulbactam vs Clindamycin in Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery: The Need for Gram-negative Coverage
Weber et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;118:1159-1163.
ABSTRACT
Prophylactic Antibiotics for Head and Neck Surgery With Flap Reconstruction
Johnson et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;118:488-490.
ABSTRACT
Bacteriologic Analysis of Wound Infection Following Major Head and Neck Surgery
Rubin et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:969-972.
ABSTRACT
|