You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 111 No. 4, April 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Acceptability and Intelligibility of Tracheoesophageal Speech

Sallie Tardy-Mitzell, MA, CCC; Moya L. Andrews, PhD, CCC; Sally A. Bowman, MS, CCC

Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111(4):213-215.


Abstract

• The original Blom-Singer voice prosthesis, introduced in 1979, has been recently modified to provide lower airway resistance. A tracheostoma breathing valve, introduced in 1982, permits unrestricted two-way breathing, yet eliminates the need for manual occlusion of the stoma. To date, the acceptability and intelligibility of tracheoesophageal (TE) speakers, using these prostheses, has not been extensively studied. Forty-six naive listeners rated the acceptability and intelligibility of 15 TE speakers, all of whom were wearing the tracheostoma breathing valve and a prototype low-pressure prosthesis. Acceptability was judged on an equal-appearing interval scale. Intelligibility judgments were based on randomized word lists of 50 items. Results suggest a high level of acceptability and intelligibility among both male and female TE speakers.

Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:213-215)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Ms Tardy-Mitzell); the Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington (Dr Andrews); and the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Ms Bowman).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 12, 1984.

Reprint requests to Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, the Neurosensory Center, 6501 Fannin, NA 200, Houston, TX 77030 (Ms Tardy-Mitzell).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Communication After Laryngectomy: An Assessment of Patient Satisfaction
Clements et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:493-496.
ABSTRACT  

A Comparative Study of Speech After Total Laryngectomy and Total Laryngopharyngectomy
Mendelsohn et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:508-510.
ABSTRACT  

A Prospective Study of Tracheoesophageal Speech
Blom et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:440-447.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.