You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 111 No. 11, November 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pharyngoesophageal Reconstruction Using Free Jejunal Interposition Grafts

Samuel R. Fisher, MD; T. Boyce Cole, MD; William C. Meyers, MD; Hilliard F. Seigler, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111(11):747-752.


Abstract

• Forty patients underwent pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with a free jejunal interposition graft (FJIG). Three categories of disease were treated: (1) primary upper aerodigestive tract carcinomas, (2) recurrent carcinomas, and (3) benign pharyngoesophageal stenosis. There were no intraoperative graft failures. Postoperative complications included four perioperative deaths, eight late graft failures, three transient fistulas, eight distal graft strictures, one prolonged ileus, two postoperative hematomas, one abdominal wound dehiscence, one abdominal abscess, and one hypoglossal nerve palsy. Of the eight patients with late graft failures, three underwent successful jejunal reimplantation, yielding an overall success rate of 88% (35/40). The advantages of an FJIG are as follows: (1) a single-stage procedure for large defects, (2) a jejunal segment approximately the size of the pharyngoesophagus, (3) tissue that is able to tolerate radiation therapy, (4) maintenance of near-physiologic swallowing mechanism, (5) denervated small-bowel model, (6) excellent palliative procedure, and (7) shortened hospitalization. Disadvantages include (1) microvascular surgical technique, (2) abdominal procedure, and (3) limited esophageal speech.

(Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:747-752)



Author Affiliations

From the Divisions of Otolaryngology (Drs Fisher and Cole), and General and Thoracic Surgery (Drs Meyers and Seigler), Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 14, 1985.

Read before the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, Dorado Beach, Puerto Rico, May 5, 1985.

Reprint requests to Box 3805, Division of Otolaryngology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 (Dr Fisher).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

MR Imaging for Predicting Neoplastic Invasion of the Cervical Esophagus
Roychowdhury et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1681-1687.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Postoperative Radiation-Associated Changes in Free Jejunal Autografts
Biel and Maisel
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;118:1037-1041.
ABSTRACT  

The Effect of Postoperative Radiation Therapy on Pharyngoesophageal Reconstruction With Free Jejunal Interposition
Petruzzelli et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:1265-1268.
ABSTRACT  

Free Flap Design in Head and Neck Reconstruction to Achieve an External Segment for Monitoring
Urken et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:1447-1453.
ABSTRACT  

Immediate Reconstruction of Pharyngoesophageal Defects: Preference or Reference
Lam et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:608-612.
ABSTRACT  

Partial vs Total Esophagectomy for Advanced Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx
Gluckman et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:69-72.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.