This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Staging and Management of Head and Neck Cancer

Michael H. Stevens, MD; H. Ric Harnsberger, MD; Anthony A. Mancuso, MD; R. Kim Davis, MD; Leland P. Johnson, MD; James L. Parkin, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111(11):735-739.

Abstract
• Forty patients with head and neck cancer had a computed tomographic (CT) scan followed by lymphadenectomy and pathologic confirmation. The overall accuracy of clinical examination of the neck was 70% vs 93% by CT. The CT correctly "upstaged" the neck in nine patients. One was upstaged from NO to N1, and four each from NO to N2 and N1 to N2. It correctly "downstaged" the neck in one patient (from N2 to N1). Eight patients had extranodal disease on CT confirmed by pathology. The CT findings were correct in ten of 11 previously treated patients. Because CT is more accurate than the clinical examination, it should be included in the staging of not only the primary tumor but also nodal disease of the neck. It can have an important role in the management of head and neck cancer.

(Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:735-739)

Author Affiliations
From the Division of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Stevens, Davis, Johnson, and Parkin), and the Department of Radiology (Drs Harnsberger and Mancuso), University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication June 14, 1985.

Read before the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, Dorado Beach, Puerto Rico, May 8, 1985.

Reprints not available.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Correlation between the incidence of central nodal necrosis in cervical lymph node metastasis and the extent of differentiation in oral squamous cell carcinoma
Morimoto et al.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:18-23.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of Cervical Metastasis: A Meta-analysis Comparing Computed Tomography With Physical Examination
Merritt et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:149-152.
ABSTRACT  

Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Palpation of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis
van den Brekel et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:666-673.
ABSTRACT  

Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Cervical Metastases With Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Hillsamer et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:1297-1301.
ABSTRACT  

Computed Tomography of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes: A Clinical, Computed Tomographic, Pathologic Correlative Study
Moreau et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:1190-1193.
ABSTRACT  

Prognostic Indicators in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Combined Therapy
Davis et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:1443-1446.
ABSTRACT  

Computed Tomography in Evaluating Metastatic Neck Disease
STEVENS and RIC
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:1041-1041.
ABSTRACT  

Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced MR Imaging of Head and Neck Lymph Nodes
Mack et al.
Radiology 2002;222:239-244.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT