 |
 |

Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Computed TomographyComparison in Imaging Oral Cavity and Pharyngeal Carcinomas
Steven D. Schaefer, MD;
Kenneth R. Maravilla, MD;
Richard A. Suss, MD;
Dennis K. Burns, MD;
Ray Nunnally, PhD;
Marie A. Merkel, MD;
Lanny G. Close, MD
Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111(11):730-734.
Abstract
Twenty-one patients with oral cavity and pharyngeal carcinomas were enrolled in a prospective protocol to study the diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging vs computed tomography. Magnetic resonance imaging was found to be superior to computed tomography in the area of tumor contrast (conspicuity) and equal or inferior in edge definition, delineation of regional disease, and lymph node metastasis. These findings are consistent with the current applications and limitations of magnetic resonance imaging.
(Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:730-734)
Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Otorhinolaryngology (Drs Schaefer and Close), Radiology (Drs Maravilla, Suss, Nunnally, and Merkel), and Pathology (Dr Burns), Southwestern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Dallas.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication June 14, 1985.
Read before the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, Dorado Beach, Puerto Rico, May 8, 1985.
Reprint requests to Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Southwestern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235 (Dr Schaefer).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
T Staging of the Laryngohypopharyngeal Carcinoma: A 7-Year Multidisciplinary Experience
Sulfaro et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:613-620.
ABSTRACT
Noninvasive Imaging of the Normal Temporal Bone: Comparison of Sagittal Surface Coil Magnetic Imaging and High-Resolution Computed Tomography
Bie et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:60-62.
ABSTRACT
|