You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 111 No. 1, January 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Changing Concepts of Acoustic Neuroma Diagnosis

David M. Barrs, MD; Derald E. Brackmann, MD; James E. Olson, MD; William F. House, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111(1):17-21.


Abstract

• Three hundred five acoustic neuromas were reviewed to determine the sensitivity of combining the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and the intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomogram (CT) as screening tests for acoustic neuroma diagnosis. The ABR detected 98% of the tumors. The enhanced CT demonstrated 97% of tumors larger than 1.5 cm, but only 48% of neuromas 1.5 cm or smaller. The combination of both ABR and enhanced CT, used as the initial screening tests, identified 99% of the neuromas. We conclude that ABR, with enhanced CT as needed, is an accurate screening protocol. This method can be used as an alternative to the traditional ABR, electronystagmography, and internal auditory canal tomograms.

(Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:17-21)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Wilford Hall US Air Force Medical Center, Lackland AFB, San Antonio, Tex (Drs Barrs and Olson); and the Otologic Medical Group, Inc, Los Angeles (Drs Brackmann and House).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 27, 1984.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Normal Brain-Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials With Abnormal Latency-Intensity Studies in Patients With Acoustic Neuromas
Legatt et al.
Arch Neurol 1988;45:1326-1330.
ABSTRACT  

Problems in Air Cisternography
Barrs and Vedder
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:769-772.
ABSTRACT  

Auditory Brain-Stem Response in Patients With Acoustic Neuromas: Wave Presence and Absence
Musiek et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:186-189.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.