You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 110 No. 12, December 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Open {nu} Closed Reduction of the Fractured Nose

Jonathan A. M. Murray, MD, FRCS, FRACS; Arnold G. D. Maran, MD, FRCS, FACS; Ian J. Mackenzie, FRCS, FDS; Gillian Raab, MSc

Arch Otolaryngol. 1984;110(12):797-802.


Abstract

• A stepwise study of nasal fractures includes an initial investigation that was carried out to discover why so many patients were awaiting rhinoplasty, which led us to find a 30% to 40% failure rate in nasal manipulation operations. We then studied the mechanics of nasal fracture by striking fresh cadaver noses. We found that if the nasal bones were deviated by more than half the bridge width, there was a concomitant C-shape fracture of the bony and cartilaginous septum. Two trials were performed, and patients with nasal deviation after trauma were allocated to either manipulation or manipulation plus excision of septal cartilage (closed or open reduction). Both trials were statistically significant, indicating that open reduction is the preferred treatment for patients with a deviation of more than half the bridge width of the nose.

(Arch Otolaryngol 1984;110:797-802)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh (Drs Murray, Maran, and Mackenzie), and the Department of Statistics, University of Edinburgh (Mr Raab).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 13, 1984.

Reprint requests to Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 9EN, Scotland (Dr Murray).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Open vs Closed Approach to the Nasal Pyramid for Fracture Reduction
Reilly and Davison
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007;9:82-86.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of nasal injuries by UK accident and emergency consultants: a questionnaire survey.
Coulson and De
Emerg. Med. J. 2006;23:523-525.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Risk of Nasal Osteotomies After Ethmoid Sinus Surgery
Gliklich and Lauretano
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:1315-1318.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.