You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 109 No. 3, March 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Current Concepts of Browpexy

F. Mark Rafaty, MD; H. George Brennan, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1983;109(3):152-154.


Abstract

• The excess skin of the upper lid is not uncommonly secondary to the ptosis of the eyebrows. Blepharoplasty not only fails to correct this deformity but, in fact, may aggravate the sagging of the eyebrow, imparting a sad and elderly appearance to the face. A gracefully arching eyebrow at or slightly above the supraorbital rim renders the face more alert and beautiful. Of many procedures described, three browpexy techniques have withstood the test of time, each with its own set of advantages and limitations: (1) direct, (2) midforehead, and (3) frontal lift. Particular emphasis is given to the coronal-type forehead lift which, in addition to browpexy, can deal with the ptosis of the forehead, transverse forehead wrinkles, and glabellar rhytids.

(Arch Otolaryngol 1983;109:152-154)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, Calif.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 12, 1982.

Read in part before the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Palm Beach, Fla, May 8, 1982.

Reprint requests to 1441 Avocado Ave, Suite 204, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (Dr Brennan).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Trichophytic Incisional Approaches to Upper Facial Rejuvenation
Holcomb and McCollough
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001;3:48-53.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Endoscopic Browlift Is the Preferred Approach for Rejuvenation of the Upper Third of the Face
Koch
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:87-90.
FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Blepharoplasty on Eyebrow Position
Frankel and Kamer
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:393-396.
ABSTRACT  

Management of the Aging Forehead
Kerth and Toriumi
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:1137-1142.
ABSTRACT  

The Versatile Midforehead Browlift
Cook et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:163-168.
ABSTRACT  

Coronal Approach for Rejuvenation of the Eyes and Forehead
Toledo and Tate
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:738-744.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.