You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 108 No. 7, July 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Low-Dose Ketamine and Diazepam

Use as an Adjunct to Local Anesthesia in an Office Operating Room

Howard A. Tobin, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1982;108(7):439-440.


Abstract

• I evaluated the response of 200 patients undergoing office surgery to lowdose ketamine hydrochloride and diazepam as an adjunct to local anesthesia. In most patients, there was a slight increase in pulse rate and BP, but this was relatively mild. In almost all patients, there were no unpleasant recollections of the operative procedure, and I concluded that combination low-dose diazepam and ketamine is an effective and safe adjunct to local anesthesia in an office operating room facility.

(Arch Otolaryngol 1982;108:439-440)



Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 8, 1982.

Dr Tobin is in private practice in Abilene, Tex.

Read before the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, New Orleans, Sept 20, 1981.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Fast-Track Office-Based Anesthesia: A Comparison of Propofol Versus Desflurane with Antiemetic Prophylaxis In Spontaneously Breathing Patients
Tang et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2001;92:95-99.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.