You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 108 No. 2, February 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Auditory Brainstem Responses During Systemic Infusion of Lidocaine

Eric Javel, PhD; Daniel F. Mouney, MD; JoAnn McGee; Edward J. Walsh, MS

Arch Otolaryngol. 1982;108(2):71-76.


Abstract

• Auditory brainstem-evoked responses (ABR) to clicks were recorded in unanesthetized restrained cats before, during, and after systemic intravenous infusion of lidocaine hydrochloride. The drug was infused continuously at varying rates. Lidocaine's major effect on ABR was to lengthen latent periods to all waveform peaks in proportion with the infusion rate. The effect on latent periods was cumulative throughout the auditory brainstem, ie, all interpeak time intervals increased. Increases in ABR latencies were not due to reductions in effective stimulus intensity because lidocaine did not reduce ABR component amplitudes or increase thresholds. The effects of the drug were reversible. The data are consistent with the notion that lidocaine, directly or indirectly, works throughout the auditory brainstem to increase axonal and synaptic conduction times.

(Arch Otolaryngol 1982;108:71-76)



Author Affiliations

From The Boys Town Institute for Communication Disorders in Children, Omaha. Dr Mouney is currently with the Department of Otolaryngology, Louisiana State University Medical School, New Orleans.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 8, 1981.

Reprint requests to The Boys Town Institute for Communication Disorders in Children, 555 N 30th St, Omaha, NE 68131 (Dr Javel).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effects of Lidocaine Infusion in Cats After Unilateral Labyrinthectomy
Parnes et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:653-656.
ABSTRACT  

Prenatal Lidocaine and the Auditory Evoked Responses in Term Infants
Diaz et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1988;142:160-161.
ABSTRACT  

Brain-Stem Auditory-Evoked Potentials During Lidocaine Infusion in Humans
Ruth et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;111:799-802.
ABSTRACT  

Treatment of Meniere's Disease by Intratympanic Injection With Lidocaine
Fradis et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;111:491-493.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.