You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 107 No. 9, September 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Controversy of Branchiogenic Carcinoma

Stuart A. McCarthy, MD; Frederick M. Turnbull, Jr, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1981;107(9):570-572.


Abstract

• Malignant transformation in a cyst of branchial cleft origin is recognized as being a rare and controversial entity. It is an unusual lesion, in that the diagnosis must be made by exclusion following certain well-established criteria used by Hayes Martin and co-workers in 1950. The controversy in regard to the existence of this neoplasm is complicated by the fact that it is located in the same anatomic region as metastatic cervical lymph nodes, thus confusing the clinical and pathologic diagnosis. A patient was seen who satisfied all criteria for the rare diagnosis of branchiogenic carcinoma. The literature and case reports since the extensive review of this topic in 1950 by Martin and co-workers are analyzed. On the basis of our report and the other literature, our conclusion is that this rare lesion of branchiogenic carcinoma definitely exists but that it must be carefully differentiated from other more common lesions. Our suggested plan of management in suspected cases would be wide surgical excision of the cyst, ipsilateral radical neck dissection, and a continuing search for a possible unknown primary tumor with origins elsewhere. Radiation therapy would be reserved for recurrences or discovery of a primary lesion.

(Arch Otolaryngol 1981;107:570-572)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of California at Irvine Medical Center, Orange.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 21, 1981.

Read in part before the American College of Surgeons, Southern California Chapter, Santa Barbara, Jan 24, 1981.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The First Branchial Cleft Carcinoma
Park and Karmody
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;118:969-971.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.