You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 107 No. 7, July 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Elimination of Glabellar Frown Lines

F. Mark Rafaty, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1981;107(7):428-430.


Abstract

• A variety of procedures have been proposed for the elimination of glabellar frown lines, which indicates that a totally satisfactory method is not yet available. This abnormality may be noted in some younger patients who may have no other signs of aging. Meloplasty, blepharoplasty, and brow-lift operations uniformly fail to improve the deformity and, in fact, may render it more noticeable. With the use of a combination of four different procedures, glabelloplasties were performed in 38 patients. These four procedures included dermabrasion of the rhytids, avulsion of the corrugator supercilii muscles, subdermal augmentation with autogenous dermis or fat, and eversion closure with running horizontal mattress sutures. These 38 patients in whom glabelloplasties were performed were studied for an average follow-up period of 13 months. Substantial improvement was noted in 34 patients. Of this group, the conditions in 22 patients were considered good, and the conditions in 12 patients were regarded as fair. In the remaining four patients, the improvement was either slight or temporary, and the operation was regarded as a failure.

(Arch Otolaryngol 1981;107:428-430)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, Calif.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 2, 1981.

Read before the fall annual meeting of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Anaheim, Calif, Sept 27, 1980.

Reprint requests to 900 Welch Rd, Suite 402, Palo Alto, CA 94304 (Dr Rafaty).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Coronal Approach for Rejuvenation of the Eyes and Forehead
Toledo and Tate
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:738-744.
ABSTRACT  

The Forehead Lift: A Review
Adamson et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;111:325-329.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.