You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 107 No. 11, November 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Mediastinal Dissection

A Multi-institutional Assessment

David E. Schuller, MD; Ronald C. Hamaker, MD; Jack L. Gluckman, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1981;107(11):715-720.


Abstract

• Mediastinal dissection was first described by George A. Sisson, MD, in 1962. However, there are no other reports in the literature describing the experience of other surgeons with this procedure. This study retrospectively analyzes the multiinstitutional experience with mediastinal dissection to examine critically its effectiveness in controlling superior mediastinal neoplastic disease and to evaluate the complications of the procedure. This article describes 21 patients from three medical centers who have undergone mediastinal dissection by three surgeons for stomal recurrences. There are six patients who are free of disease for periods ranging from three months to six years postoperatively. Reconstructive techniques ranged from deltopectoral flap, gastric pull-up, or jejunal free grafts for esophageal reconstruction, myocutaneous flaps for tracheal reconstruction, to deltopectoral or thoracoacromial skin flaps for external resurfacing. This article also describes modifications designed to decrease mortality and to expedite the reconstruction, considering that this series suggests that mediastinal dissection probably should be considered as a palliative rather than curative attempt.

(Arch Otolaryngol 1981;107:715-720)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Schuller); Head and Neck Associates, Inc, Indianapolis (Dr Hamaker); and the Department of Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Cincinnati (Dr Gluckman).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 26, 1981.

Read before the combined meeting of the Society of Head and Neck Surgeons and the American Society of Head and Neck Surgery, Phoenix, Ariz, March 14, 1981.

Reprint requests to the Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, 456 Clinic Dr, Columbus, OH 43210 (Dr Schuller).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.