You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 107 No. 10, October 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Gastric Pull-up vs Deltopectoral Flap for Reconstruction of the Cervical Esophagus

John M. Fredrickson, MD; Derrick J. H. Wagenfeld, MB; Griff Pearson, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1981;107(10):613-616.


Abstract

• Reconstruction of the cervical esophagus and pharynx after a total laryngopharyngectomy for patients with advanced hypopharyngeal cancer still remains a problem for surgeons. The results of two procedures, the tubed deltopectoral flap reconstruction and the gastric pull-up operation with pharyngogastric anastomosis, which are used in fulfilling postoperative deglutition requirements, were compared. There were nine patients in the gastric pull-up group and eight patients in the deltopectoral flap group. The groups were reasonably comparable with regard to age, sex, preoperative radiotherapy, and stage of tumor. Three of the patients in the gastric pull-up group were operated on for palliation alone. Average operation-to-swallow time was 12 days for the gastric pull-up group and 90 days for the deltopectoral flap group. Reconstruction of the gullet with the stomach pull-up operation seems to be superior to the tubed deltopectoral flap. This is especially true if the operation is palliative because the patient is unlikely to survive more than one year after surgery.

(Arch Otolaryngol 1981;107:613-616)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology (Drs Fredrickson and Wagenfeld) and Surgery (Dr Pearson), University of Toronto.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 11, 1980.

Reprint requests to Department of Otolaryngology, Medical Sciences Building, Room 7310, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto 5, Ontario, Canada (Dr Fredrickson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Conservation of the Hypopharyngeal Mucous Membrane in Total Laryngectomy
Schaefer et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:491-495.
ABSTRACT  

Avoiding Stenosis in the Tubed Greater Pectoral Flap in Pharyngeal Repair
Lam et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:428-431.
ABSTRACT  

Hypopharyngeal Reconstruction
FEE
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984;110:384-385.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.