You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 107 No. 10, October 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Acoustic Neuromas

Diagnostic Efficiency of Various Test Combinations

Jens Thomsen, MD, PhD; Jørgen Nyboe, PhD; Peter Borum, MD; Mirko Tos, MD, PhD; Claus Barfoed, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1981;107(10):601-607.


Abstract

• In the majority of diagnostic tests usually used in the search for acoustic tumors, there is a large difference in the outcome between patients with and without tumors. Because of a possible coherence between the tests applied, a statistical analysis of this connection was performed with the aid of a logistic model. The best single investigation used to differentiate between patients with and without tumors was tomography of the internal acoustic meatus. This examination was used in combination with the differential caloric test and the alternate binaural loudness balance recruitment test to differentiate completely between patients with and without tumors. Results of other examinations did not contribute significantly to the differentiation between patients with and without tumors. This factor did not render the other examinations superfluous because the analysis was valuable only in patients with a hearing level better or equal to 80 dB. By applying the other tests, information was obtained on pressure conditions in the internal acoustic meatus and possible difficulties at surgery, as well as information about the size of the tumor.

(Arch Otolaryngol 1981;107:601-607)



Author Affiliations

From the University ENT Department, Gentofte Hospital (Drs Thomsen and Tos), Hellerup, Denmark; and the University ENT Department (Drs Borum and Barfoed) and Department of Medical Statistics (Dr Nyboe), Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 8, 1981.

Reprint requests to University ENT Department, Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup DK-2900, Denmark (Dr Thomsen).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.