You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 11, November 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Management of T3 Glottic Cancer

Andrew R. Harwood, MB, ChB; Douglas P. Bryce, MD; Walter D. Rider, MD, ChB

Arch Otolaryngol. 1980;106(11):697-699.


Abstract

• We reviewed 144 cases of T3NOMO glottic cancer. One hundred twelve patients were treated by radical radiotherapy with surgery for salvage (RRSS), and 28 patients were treated by combined preoperative irradiation and laryngectomy. Two patients underwent palliative irradiation, and two patients had surgery alone. Half of the number of patients are alive and well at five years; 30% of the patients died of glottic cancer. No significant difference in crude survival, tumor-related deaths, or deaths from surgical complications was observed between the RRSS group and the combined treatment group. The local control rate by radiotherapy was higher in female patients vs male patients (92% vs 44%); the local control rate was higher in men aged more than 60 years vs male patients who were younger than 60 years (52% vs 34%). Half of the larynges removed in the combined treatment group contained no tumor. We concluded that RRSS, because of its potential to save the larynx and voice, is the treatment of choice in female patients with T3 glottic cancer and is an acceptable alternative to combined treatment in male patients when good follow-up facilities exist.

(Arch Otolaryngol 106:697-699, 1980)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Radiation Oncology, The Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto (Drs Harwood and Rider), and the Department of Otolaryngology, University of Toronto (Dr Bryce).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 11, 1980.

Read before the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, Palm Beach, Fla, April 17, 1980.

Reprint requests to Department of Radiation Oncology, The Princess Margaret Hospital, 500 Sherbourne St, Toronto, Ontario M4X 1K9 Canada (Dr Harwood).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

T3 Glottic Carcinoma Revisited: Transglottic vs Pure Glottic Carcinoma
Hao et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:166-170.
ABSTRACT  

Laryngeal Preservation for Advanced Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancers
Clayman et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:219-223.
ABSTRACT  

The Treatment of T3 Glottic Carcinoma With Vertical Partial Laryngectomy
Kessler et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:1196-1199.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.