You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 9, September 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Evaluation of Nasal Obstruction

A Study of 1,000 Patients

Thomas V. McCaffrey, MD; Eugene B. Kern, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1979;105(9):542-545.


Abstract

• Nasal airway resistance was evaluated in 1,000 patients who were seen at the Mayo Clinic between 1971 and 1977 for rhinologic complaints. Nasal obstruction was reported as the major symptom in 863 patients. Nasal airway resistance correlated well with the side and the severity of the obstructive symptoms. Symptoms of nasal obstruction typically occurred with a total nasal resistance greater than 3 cm H2O/L/s. Rhinoscopic evidence of nasal deformity could not be used to predict an increase in nasal resistance since many patients with rhinoscopically abnormal noses had "normal" nasal resistances. We conclude that the calculation of nasal airway resistance is a useful technique in the clinical evaluation of nasal obstruction. Nasal airway resistance data provide objective values that can substantiate and quantitate the symptoms of nasal obstruction.

(Arch Otolaryngol 105:542-545, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 25, 1978.

Read before the meeting of the American Rhinologic Society, Los Angeles, Sept 7, 1978.

Reprint requests to Section of Publications, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901 (Dr McCaffrey).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Phonatory Effects of Airway Dehydration: Preliminary Evidence for Impaired Compensation to Oral Breathing in Individuals With a History of Vocal Fatigue
Sivasankar et al.
JSLHR 2008;51:1494-1506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Obstructive sleep apnoea and oral breathing in patients free of nasal obstruction
Koutsourelakis et al.
Eur Respir J 2006;28:1222-1228.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of Adenoidal Obstruction in Children: Clinical Signs Versus Roentgenographic Findings
Paradise et al.
Pediatrics 1998;101:979-986.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reconstruction of Caudal End of Septum: A Case for Transplantation
Slavit et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:1091-1098.
ABSTRACT  

Effect of Inhaling Heated Vapor on Symptoms of the Common Cold
Forstall et al.
JAMA 1994;271:1109-1111.
ABSTRACT  

Effect of Inhaling Heated Vapor on Symptoms of the Common Cold
Macknin et al.
JAMA 1990;264:989-991.
ABSTRACT  

Effects of Size of the Nasal Airway on Nasal Airflow Rate
Warren et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:405-408.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.