You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 104 No. 8, August 1978 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prediction of Sensorineural Hearing Level From the Brain Stem Evoked Response

James Jerger, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1978;104(8):456-461.


Abstract

• Correlational analysis was carried out between the auditory brain stem evoked response (BER) threshold, BER latency, and various audiometric indices in 275 ears with varying degrees and configurations of sensorineural hearing loss.

Results confirm the importance of sensitivity in the 1 to 4-kHz region to the brain stem response. Sensitivity over this frequency region is best predicted as 0.6 of the BER threshold. Brain stem evoked response latency in the 70- to 90-dB hearing level range increases about 0.2 ms for each 30-dB increase in the steepness of the audiometric contour between 1 and 4 kHz. Finally, audiometric shape appears to be more important than absolute high-frequency sensitivity in determining BER latency.

(Arch Otolaryngol 104:456-461, 1978)



Author Affiliations

Larry Mauldin

From the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine and the Neurosensory Center, Houston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 15, 1978.

Reprint requests to Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine and Neurosensory Center, 1200 Moursund Ave, Houston, TX 77030 (Dr Jerger).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Neurofibromatosis 1 (Recklinghausen Disease) and Neurofibromatosis 2 (Bilateral Acoustic Neurofibromatosis) An Update
Mulvihill et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1990;113:39-52.
ABSTRACT  

Hearing Loss Following Hemophilus influenzae Meningitis in Infancy: Diagnosis by Evoked Response Audiometry
MacDonald and Feinstein
Arch Neurol 1984;41:1058-1059.
ABSTRACT  

Auditory Brain-stem Responses in Infants With Down's Syndrome
Folsom et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1983;109:607-610.
ABSTRACT  

Frequency-Selective Auditory Brain-stem Response in Newborns and Infants
Yamada et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1983;109:79-82.
ABSTRACT  

Effects of Age and Sex on Auditory Brainstem Response
Jerger and Hall
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980;106:387-391.
ABSTRACT  

Auditory Brainstem Response: Sensory Assessment by Bone Conduction Masking
Hicks
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980;106:392-395.
ABSTRACT  

Speech, Impedance, and Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in Brainstem Tumors: Importance of a Multiple-Test Strategy
Jerger et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980;106:218-223.
ABSTRACT  

Auditory Brain-stem Response Audiometry in Children
Weber
CLIN PEDIATR 1979;18:746-749.
ABSTRACT  

Auditory Brain Stem Evoked Responses to Bone-Conducted Signals
Mauldin and Jerger
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1979;105:656-661.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1978 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.