You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 104 No. 12, December 1978 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Human Auditory Nerve Action Potentials and Brain Stem Evoked Responses

Latency-Intensity Functions in Detection of Cochlear and Retrocochlear Abnormality

Alfred C. Coats, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1978;104(12):709-717.


Abstract

• Latency-intensity (L-I) functions for (1) the auditory nerve action potential (AP) N1 peak, (2) the brain stem evoked response (BER) V peak, and (3) the N1-V interval were related to hearing level and lesion location. The AP L-I curves tended to steepen with increasing 4 to 8 kHz hearing level. This relationship was identical for cochlear and retrocochlear ears, except for a few retrocochlear ears with "inappropriate AP preservation." Both high-frequency cochlear loss and retrocochlear abnormality prolonged peak V latency, but retrocochlear abnormality generally prolonged it more. Among cochlear-loss ears, as 4 to 8 kHz hearing levels increased, N1-V intervals decreased and L-I curve slopes increased. In contrast, retrocochlear abnormality greatly prolonged N1-V intervals. As a retrocochlear sign, N1-V prolongation was slightly more reliable than V prolongation.

(Arch Otolaryngol 104:709-717, 1978)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences and Neurology (Neurophysiology), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 1, 1978.

Reprint requests to Institute of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Disorders, Neurosensory Center of Houston, 6501 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030 (Dr Coats).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Normal Brain-Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials With Abnormal Latency-Intensity Studies in Patients With Acoustic Neuromas
Legatt et al.
Arch Neurol 1988;45:1326-1330.
ABSTRACT  

Hearing Loss in an Institutionalized Mentally Retarded Population: Identification by Auditory Brainstem Response
Stein et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:32-35.
ABSTRACT  

Brain-Stem Evoked Response Waveform Variation Associated With Recurrent Otitis Media
Lenhardt et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;111:315-316.
ABSTRACT  

Auditory Brain-stem Responses in Infants With Down's Syndrome
Folsom et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1983;109:607-610.
ABSTRACT  

Meniere's Disease and the Summating Potential: II. Vestibular Test Results
Coats
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1981;107:263-270.
ABSTRACT  

Earspeaker Coupling Effects on Auditory Action Potential and Brainstem Responses
Coats and Kidder
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980;106:339-344.
ABSTRACT  

Brainstem Auditory-Evoked Responses: Normal Variation as a Function of Stimulus and Subject Characteristics
Stockard et al.
Arch Neurol 1979;36:823-831.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1978 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.