You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 101 No. 3, March 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY -1974
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Surgical Repair of Facial Nerve Branches

An Analysis of Different Sheathing and Suturing Techniques

LCDR Gregory J. Szal, MC, USNR; CAPT Tom Miller, MC, USN

Arch Otolaryngol. 1975;101(3):160-165.


Abstract

The distal branches of the facial nerve are sometimes severed in various forms of trauma. These distal branches respond to repair differently than do the main trunk or other peripheral nerves. Actual axon counts must be done to determine the percentage of regrowth rather than measuring nerve diameter.

Physiologic and histologic techniques were used to analyze sheathing and suturing techniques in the repair of facial nerve branches in rabbits. Repair sites were examined at various intervals up to four months after repair. Very small suture material (10-0) must be used. Vein sheaths and silicone elastomer (Silastic) sheaths caused decreased axon regrowth, and strictures occurred when silicone elastomer sheaths were used. Seven stitches provided the best results in terms of axon regrowth, prevention of neuromas, and return of function. Three sutures or a continuous stitch produced poorer overall results.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Naval Regional Medical Center, Oakland, Calif.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 12, 1974.

Read before the Tenth Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc., Palm Beach, Fla, April 22, 1974.

The opinions and assertions herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Navy Department or the Naval Service at large.

Reprint requests to the Department of Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Naval Regional Medical Center, Oakland, CA 94627 (LCDR Szal).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Current Issues in Nerve Repair
Terris and Fee
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:725-731.
ABSTRACT  

Interfascicular Nerve Repair: Is it Applicable in Facial Nerve Injuries?
Crumley
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980;106:313-316.
ABSTRACT  

A New Pattern of Needle for Microsurgical Repair of Nerves
BENTALL and RAJI
J Hand Surg Eur Vol 1979;Original Series, Volume 11:306-308.
ABSTRACT  

Facial Nerve Repair With Tissue Adhesive
Siedentop and Loewy
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1979;105:423-426.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.