You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 100 No. 1, July 1974 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Automated Newborn Hearing Screening, the Crib-o-gram

F. Blair Simmons, MD; Frederica N. Russ, RN

Arch Otolaryngol. 1974;100(1):1-7.


Abstract

A completely automated method for hearing screening in either the well-baby or intensive care unit nursery has been developed on a population of 6,000 infants. A motion-sensitive transducer, placed beneath or in the infant's crib, detects virtually any motion stronger than an eye blink (including respiration). A stripchart automatically records this motor activity before and after a test sound, shuts itself off, then recycles at predetermined intervals 20 times in 24 hours. Responses for this period (or lack of them) are scored in about 30 seconds by experienced readers and in 60 to 90 seconds by inexperienced readers. This preliminary report describes our experiences with two such systems, a multichannel unit capable of screening large well-baby nurseries (32 and more bassinets), and smaller sick-baby nurseries on demand. Screening cost is estimated at 85¢ per child, and no highly trained personnel are required. Operation is seven days per week on a totally automated basis. While no such test can be validated for general use without long-term follow-up, this technique has several advantages over other screening tests. It does detect deafness, and deserves a more widespread clinical trial.



Author Affiliations

Stanford, Calif

From the Division of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 23, 1973.

Reprint requests to 300 Pasteur Dr, Room R135, Stanford, CA 94305 (Dr. Simmons).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Newborn Hearing Screening Using the Crib-O-Gram
Webb et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:420-422.
ABSTRACT  

New Advances in Objective Audiometry
Don and Kohut
JAMA 1975;234:823-823.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1974 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.